Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Select Page

A Pragmatic Legal Expert System

A Pragmatic Legal Expert System

The history of the development of legal expert systems has, for the most part, been characterized by the development and implementation of complex models of legal reasoning.

This book aims to show that a legal expert system need not be based upon a complex model of legal reasoning in order to produce useful advice. It advocates a pragmatic approach to the design of legal expert systems’an approach based on the way in which lawyers deal with the law on a day-to-day basis.

It argues that a system based upon a simple model of legal reasoning can still produce good advice, where that advice is evaluated by reference to the accuracy of the system’s predictions and to the quality of its arguments. Furthermore, such a system, with its simpler knowledge representation structure, makes simpler the process of knowledge acquisition.

These arguments are made theoretically, and then by example. I have developed a legal expert system which is based on a pragmatic approach to the law. The development and testing of that system, called SHYSTER, is described in this book.

SHYSTER is of a general design, so that it can operate in different legal domains. It was designed to provide advice in areas of case law that have been specified by a legal expert using a specially developed specification language.

SHYSTER is a case-based legal expert system. Its knowledge of the law is acquired, and represented, as information about cases. It produces its advice by examining, and arguing about, the similarities and differences between cases. By contrast, a rule-based expert system represents the law using rules. A hybrid system uses both rule-based and case-based techniques. SHYSTER has been designed so that it can be linked with a rule-based system to form a hybrid legal expert system.

  • Chapter 1 presents a critical analysis of previous work of relevance to the development of legal expert systems.
  • Chapter 2 explains the pragmatic approach that was adopted in the development of SHYSTER.
  • The implementation of SHYSTER is detailed using examples in chapter 3.
  • Chapter 4 describes the testing of SHYSTER, and conclusions are drawn from those tests in chapter 5.
  • Examples of SHYSTER’s output are provided in appendices.

A Pragmatic Legal Expert System

by James Popple (PDF) – 406 pages, 8.6MB

A Pragmatic Legal Expert System by James Popple